DefaultRisk.com the web's biggest credit risk modeling resource.

Home Store Glossary Links Site Guide Search
pp_liqty_05

Up

Submit Your Paper

Post Your Résumé

For Recruiters

Today's Featured Book

Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance
Modelling Extremal Events for Insurance and Finance

by Paul Embrechts, Claudia Klüppelberg, Thomas Mikosch, Springer, (October 15, 2004), Hardcover, 655 pages

Fitch Quantitative Financial Research (QFR)
Training Discounted for DefaultRisk.com visitors only:

The Mathematics of Credit Derivatives: The Essential Credit Modelling and Pricing Companion
by Philipp J. Schönbucher,
WBS Training, August 2003, DVD / Interactive CD-ROM
Sponsor:
Shop at Amazon.com and support DefaultRisk.com

In Rememberance: World Trade Center (WTC)

Liquidity in U.S. Fixed Income Markets: A comparison of the bid-ask spread in corporate, government and municipal bond markets

by Sugato Chakravarty of Purdue University, and
Asani Sarkar of Federal Reserve Bank of New York

March 15, 1999

Abstract: We examine the determinants of the realized bid-ask spread in the U.S. corporate, municipal and government bond markets for the years 1995 to 1997, based on newly available transactions data. Overall, we find that liquidity is an important determinant of the realized bid-ask spread all three markets. Specifically, in all markets, the realized bid-ask spread decreases in the trading volume. Additionally, risk factors are important in the corporate and municipal markets. In these markets, the bid-ask spread increases in the remaining-time-to-maturity of a bond. The corporate bond spread also increases in credit risk and the age of a bond. The municipal bond spread increases in the after-tax bond yield. Controlling for other factors, the municipal bond spread is higher than the government bond spread by about 9 cents per $100 par value, but the corporate bond spread is not. Consistent with improved pricing transparency, the bid-ask spread in the corporate and municipal bond markets is lower in 1997 by about 7 to 11 cents per $100 par value, relative to the earlier years. Finally, the ten largest corporate bond dealers earn 15 cents per $100 par value higher than the remaining dealers, after controlling for differences in the characteristics of bonds traded by each group. We find no such differences for the government and municipal bond dealers.

JEL Classification: G14.

Books Referenced in this Paper:  (what is this?)

Download paper (192K PDF) 43 pages

[Home] [Liquidity Risk Papers]

Support DefaultRisk.com by shopping at Amazon.com

 

 

Home ] Up ]

Please contact me with problems or suggestions.
Copyright © 2000-2008 DefaultRisk.com
Last modified: August 27, 2008